<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upcoming redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2007/03/30/upcoming-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2007/03/30/upcoming-redesign/</link>
	<description>Readings, insights and understanding from the I Ching, the oracle of Change.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Rand Noel</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2007/03/30/upcoming-redesign/#comment-42566</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=393#comment-42566</guid>
		<description>OK! I should be the last one writing about this subject since I closed my own Yi site down back in â€˜03 with grandiose ideas of some future redesign and haven't done much in that regard as yet.  However, that being said, my first thought was about the colour of Clarity. I have always liked the yellow and blue so have never mentioned it prior to this. Imagine my surprise when I read the post previous to this. My personal misgiving about the yellow and blue theme is that it doesn't strike me as very Chinese. Yellow of course is the Emperor's colour, but not the shade of yellow of the Clarity site. Green and Red, of course, are the primary â€œChinese coloursâ€ that one tends to associate with a work such as this. The shades that would be the best are not necessarily the best for a website. I had this difficulty with my own site and ended up using black backgrounds with red and green blocks in tables etc. with light coloured type. I also used many Chinese backgrounds and good contrasting type. The thing is, the present Clarity site seems to me to be too â€˜pastelâ€™ for lack of a better term in what I would perceive should be more dynamic in terms of colour. Naturally, one canâ€™t please everyoneâ€™s personal taste and the authors taste is certainly tantamount, since she is the one that views it the most. Also, in terms of marketing, one might be more disposed to please the public than oneself. If, however, the bulk of the site is not a marketing strategy then ones personal touch may be more apt and only those pages that are meant for selling (i.e. books) may be dressed up for the buyers appeal.
 In my travels and personal works of Asian documents, I find that many an author of computer sites in China use Feng (Fueng) Shui Consultants, which as I am sure you know, utilises the trigrams and other aspects of the Yi in there determinations. I pray this information doesnâ€™t sound too forward or assuming, but rather, as intended, just my personal input to your inquiry.  Sincerely â€“Rand Noelâ€¦.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK! I should be the last one writing about this subject since I closed my own Yi site down back in â€˜03 with grandiose ideas of some future redesign and haven&#8217;t done much in that regard as yet.  However, that being said, my first thought was about the colour of Clarity. I have always liked the yellow and blue so have never mentioned it prior to this. Imagine my surprise when I read the post previous to this. My personal misgiving about the yellow and blue theme is that it doesn&#8217;t strike me as very Chinese. Yellow of course is the Emperor&#8217;s colour, but not the shade of yellow of the Clarity site. Green and Red, of course, are the primary â€œChinese coloursâ€ that one tends to associate with a work such as this. The shades that would be the best are not necessarily the best for a website. I had this difficulty with my own site and ended up using black backgrounds with red and green blocks in tables etc. with light coloured type. I also used many Chinese backgrounds and good contrasting type. The thing is, the present Clarity site seems to me to be too â€˜pastelâ€™ for lack of a better term in what I would perceive should be more dynamic in terms of colour. Naturally, one canâ€™t please everyoneâ€™s personal taste and the authors taste is certainly tantamount, since she is the one that views it the most. Also, in terms of marketing, one might be more disposed to please the public than oneself. If, however, the bulk of the site is not a marketing strategy then ones personal touch may be more apt and only those pages that are meant for selling (i.e. books) may be dressed up for the buyers appeal.<br />
 In my travels and personal works of Asian documents, I find that many an author of computer sites in China use Feng (Fueng) Shui Consultants, which as I am sure you know, utilises the trigrams and other aspects of the Yi in there determinations. I pray this information doesnâ€™t sound too forward or assuming, but rather, as intended, just my personal input to your inquiry.  Sincerely â€“Rand Noelâ€¦.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2007/03/30/upcoming-redesign/#comment-42224</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=393#comment-42224</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Thank you!&lt;/b&gt;

Coloured background - yes, I agree, it's a bit unsubtle. Lots of straight lines, right angles and sharp contrasts. I'll ask Dawud to tone it down for me.

The top navigation is getting revamped - I hope to get two 'levels' of navigation up there, and yes it will look more like navigation. I'd also like to make it text-based rather than graphic - partly for the search engines, partly for people browsing with images turned off, and partly for ease of editing.

Too much text introducing site sections? I hadn't thought of that at all. Thank you for the tip! (I'm starting rewriting these today - nice timing.)

Home page - yes, it's going to look like the rest of the site, without javascript stuff. The trick is to decide what text belongs at the very top, if I'm not going to compromise by having four possibilities...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Thank you!</b></p>
<p>Coloured background - yes, I agree, it&#8217;s a bit unsubtle. Lots of straight lines, right angles and sharp contrasts. I&#8217;ll ask Dawud to tone it down for me.</p>
<p>The top navigation is getting revamped - I hope to get two &#8216;levels&#8217; of navigation up there, and yes it will look more like navigation. I&#8217;d also like to make it text-based rather than graphic - partly for the search engines, partly for people browsing with images turned off, and partly for ease of editing.</p>
<p>Too much text introducing site sections? I hadn&#8217;t thought of that at all. Thank you for the tip! (I&#8217;m starting rewriting these today - nice timing.)</p>
<p>Home page - yes, it&#8217;s going to look like the rest of the site, without javascript stuff. The trick is to decide what text belongs at the very top, if I&#8217;m not going to compromise by having four possibilities&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewald</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2007/03/30/upcoming-redesign/#comment-42212</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=393#comment-42212</guid>
		<description>I've always thought that the Clarity logo very well fits the atmosphere of the site and your business. However, the site layout, with the dark blue of the menu gradually going to yellow by the white, doesn't quite seem to fit the logo. It seems a bit coarse, not well-defined. I'd like to see the delicateness, mystery, lovelyness and precision of the logo styling reflected in the layout of the general site design.
The top navigation currently doesn't quite work visually. The font doesn't seem to fit the rest of the site, and the links don't really look like navigation. I'd like the top navigation to look a little bit more like tabs.
Generally, navigation currently seems a bit messy and unclear. It's hard to find what you're looking for, it's not very intuitive. It very much needs regrouping. But you are already working on it.
Mostly, I feel there's a bit too much text currently to introduce the site sections. I'd find it easier to navigate the site when the section introductions start with something more brief, so that I can quickly scan where what I'm looking for is located, and click the appropriate link. You have to scroll too much as it is now.
The front page that you currently have seems a bit uninviting. The top part, that people see first, seems a bit empty. That has in part to do with the navigational links to the four sections, that doesn't quite work visually. As with the top navigation, the font doesn't fit with the rest of the site. I personally find that the flowers don't quite fit the theme of Online Clarity. I'd rather see some picture a bit more related to the Yi.
I think it would be better to have the descriptive texts that show up when you hover your mouse over the four section links have their own constant spot. Visitors shouldn't need to do something in order to read those texts.
I find the picture of yourself on the site to be a very good one. It is inviting and nice. It'll probably be hard to get a better one, though you might be thinking of replacing it, as you're a bit older and wiser now than when it was taken.
I like the colors of the site. There's indeed no need to change them. Except for the top and front page section navigation, the fonts are okay. Generally the site currently does look nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that the Clarity logo very well fits the atmosphere of the site and your business. However, the site layout, with the dark blue of the menu gradually going to yellow by the white, doesn&#8217;t quite seem to fit the logo. It seems a bit coarse, not well-defined. I&#8217;d like to see the delicateness, mystery, lovelyness and precision of the logo styling reflected in the layout of the general site design.<br />
The top navigation currently doesn&#8217;t quite work visually. The font doesn&#8217;t seem to fit the rest of the site, and the links don&#8217;t really look like navigation. I&#8217;d like the top navigation to look a little bit more like tabs.<br />
Generally, navigation currently seems a bit messy and unclear. It&#8217;s hard to find what you&#8217;re looking for, it&#8217;s not very intuitive. It very much needs regrouping. But you are already working on it.<br />
Mostly, I feel there&#8217;s a bit too much text currently to introduce the site sections. I&#8217;d find it easier to navigate the site when the section introductions start with something more brief, so that I can quickly scan where what I&#8217;m looking for is located, and click the appropriate link. You have to scroll too much as it is now.<br />
The front page that you currently have seems a bit uninviting. The top part, that people see first, seems a bit empty. That has in part to do with the navigational links to the four sections, that doesn&#8217;t quite work visually. As with the top navigation, the font doesn&#8217;t fit with the rest of the site. I personally find that the flowers don&#8217;t quite fit the theme of Online Clarity. I&#8217;d rather see some picture a bit more related to the Yi.<br />
I think it would be better to have the descriptive texts that show up when you hover your mouse over the four section links have their own constant spot. Visitors shouldn&#8217;t need to do something in order to read those texts.<br />
I find the picture of yourself on the site to be a very good one. It is inviting and nice. It&#8217;ll probably be hard to get a better one, though you might be thinking of replacing it, as you&#8217;re a bit older and wiser now than when it was taken.<br />
I like the colors of the site. There&#8217;s indeed no need to change them. Except for the top and front page section navigation, the fonts are okay. Generally the site currently does look nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
