<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synchronicity and inner work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/09/02/synchronicity-and-inner-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/09/02/synchronicity-and-inner-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hexagram 5: Waiting &#124; 'Answers' I Ching blog</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/09/02/synchronicity-and-inner-work/#comment-49619</link>
		<dc:creator>Hexagram 5: Waiting &#124; 'Answers' I Ching blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=314#comment-49619</guid>
		<description>[...] which is neither of these two, but I think it&#8217;s the way of the rainmaker. (I first heard the rainmaker&#8217;s story from Stephen Karcher - listen through, and you&#8217;ll see what I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which is neither of these two, but I think it&#8217;s the way of the rainmaker. (I first heard the rainmaker&#8217;s story from Stephen Karcher - listen through, and you&#8217;ll see what I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/09/02/synchronicity-and-inner-work/#comment-18462</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=314#comment-18462</guid>
		<description>I don't quite subscribe to it all, myself - not to the point where I'm replying to myself here, anyway ;) . But I think that before you could believe it all, you'd need to expand your idea of 'I' so much that being 'alone' would no longer hold any fear. You can't be alone in the big world if there is no world bigger than you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite subscribe to it all, myself - not to the point where I&#8217;m replying to myself here, anyway <img src='http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . But I think that before you could believe it all, you&#8217;d need to expand your idea of &#8216;I&#8217; so much that being &#8216;alone&#8217; would no longer hold any fear. You can&#8217;t be alone in the big world if there is no world bigger than you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernadette</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/09/02/synchronicity-and-inner-work/#comment-18336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernadette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=314#comment-18336</guid>
		<description>You see this freaks me out. If everything is in here and my boyfriend for example is my creation, that means I'm alone and you and everyone else is my creation, etc. So if you reply to this, it's not you replying it's me replyinig to me. I really have a problem with that becuase I think it's said the greatest fear is that of being alone, and this story indicates that I'm alone with just lots of phantom creations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You see this freaks me out. If everything is in here and my boyfriend for example is my creation, that means I&#8217;m alone and you and everyone else is my creation, etc. So if you reply to this, it&#8217;s not you replying it&#8217;s me replyinig to me. I really have a problem with that becuase I think it&#8217;s said the greatest fear is that of being alone, and this story indicates that I&#8217;m alone with just lots of phantom creations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
