Comments on: I Ching for activists at GreatVessel.com http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/ Readings, insights and understanding from the I Ching, the oracle of Change. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:16:16 +0000 By: Nicky http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/#comment-7368 Nicky Wed, 17 May 2006 14:15:56 +0000 http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=262#comment-7368 Having read the news this morning on the speculation of the possibility of the US declaring war on Iran I thought that people might be interested in what the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had to say in his letter to the US President, Goerge W. Bush: http://www.president.ir/eng/ahmadinejad/cronicnews/1385/02/19/index-e.htm#b3 Love Nicky xx Having read the news this morning on the speculation of the possibility of the US declaring war on Iran I thought that people might be interested in what the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had to say in his letter to the US President, Goerge W. Bush:

http://www.president.ir/eng/ahmadinejad/cronicnews/1385/02/19/index-e.htm#b3

Love
Nicky
xx

]]> By: Kevin http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/#comment-5265 Kevin Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:16:44 +0000 http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=262#comment-5265 So sorry you had trouble navigating the blog John, Hilary appears to have fixed the link - thanks H. It seems the reading pressed a few of your buttons! I certainly found it disturbing. You know it was a reading specifically about what one can do - But as someone who does not hesitate to write to politicians and who often gets results I might see it differently from others. Maybe your post was the proof of why we should not have published the other reading - We were certainly worried about folks reaction. I was deeply shocked by it. At the time the three of us just sat and looked at each other in silence. "If the answer is so bad they can’t publish it than they shouldn’t have asked in the first place." - I wholeheartedly agree - In future I shall only ask questions for which we are sure to get good answers. But seriously - Why did the question / answer offend you so much? Could it be that the Yi’s response was such a challenge? So sorry you had trouble navigating the blog John, Hilary appears to have fixed the link - thanks H.

It seems the reading pressed a few of your buttons! I certainly found it disturbing.

You know it was a reading specifically about what one can do - But as someone who does not hesitate to write to politicians and who often gets results I might see it differently from others.

Maybe your post was the proof of why we should not have published the other reading - We were certainly worried about folks reaction. I was deeply shocked by it. At the time the three of us just sat and looked at each other in silence.

“If the answer is so bad they can’t publish it than they shouldn’t have asked in the first place.” - I wholeheartedly agree - In future I shall only ask questions for which we are sure to get good answers.

But seriously - Why did the question / answer offend you so much? Could it be that the Yi’s response was such a challenge?

]]> By: Hilary http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/#comment-5212 Hilary Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:06:13 +0000 http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=262#comment-5212 My fault - on the navigation part, at least, can't answer for the hallucinogens. I gave a direct link to the blog, when you're meant to access it framed through their site. Try starting at the <a href="http://www.greatvessel.com">home page</a> and following links to the blog and such-like. My fault - on the navigation part, at least, can’t answer for the hallucinogens. I gave a direct link to the blog, when you’re meant to access it framed through their site. Try starting at the home page and following links to the blog and such-like.

]]> By: John http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/#comment-5206 John Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:49:56 +0000 http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=262#comment-5206 I meant "wandering" not "wondering" although the latter seems to work. I guess I haven't used enough hallucinogens either to spell or understand what they meant. I meant “wandering” not “wondering” although the latter seems to work.
I guess I haven’t used enough hallucinogens either to spell or understand what they meant.

]]> By: John http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/04/06/i-ching-for-activists-at-greatvesselcom/#comment-5205 John Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:45:07 +0000 http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/?p=262#comment-5205 Frankly I tried to navigate the "Wandering Sages" blog and it was rather like wondering Wonderland in circles in a blindfold. If the answer is so bad they can't publish it than they shouldn't have asked in the first place. It is always better to ask questions which you have hope of influencing the outcome, smaller, more "intimate" questions as Professor Crane said. I'm not trying to be offensive but some of these guys may have indulged in hallucinogens a bit too much. Frankly I tried to navigate the “Wandering Sages” blog and it was rather like wondering Wonderland in circles in a blindfold.
If the answer is so bad they can’t publish it than they shouldn’t have asked in the first place.
It is always better to ask questions which you have hope of influencing the outcome, smaller, more “intimate” questions as Professor Crane said.
I’m not trying to be offensive but some of these guys may have indulged in hallucinogens a bit too much.

]]>