<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the I Ching?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/</link>
	<description>Readings, insights and understanding from the I Ching, the oracle of Change.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-18997</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-18997</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links, that's a well-written blog. I couldn't really comment on Gnosticism, though - I just liked the way this particular Gnostic looked at Yi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links, that&#8217;s a well-written blog. I couldn&#8217;t really comment on Gnosticism, though - I just liked the way this particular Gnostic looked at Yi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W.</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine has a blog on various religious topics. It comments on Gnosticism occasionally, often in a satirical light. I'd be curious to hear your take on things. It's at &lt;a href="http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;

Some gnostic related postings include; 
http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001204.html
http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001197.html
http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001261.html

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine has a blog on various religious topics. It comments on Gnosticism occasionally, often in a satirical light. I&#8217;d be curious to hear your take on things. It&#8217;s at <a href="http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/">link</a></p>
<p>Some gnostic related postings include;<br />
<a href="http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001204.html" >http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001204.html</a><br />
<a href="http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001197.html" >http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001197.html</a><br />
<a href="http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001261.html" >http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001261.html</a></p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Funeral of the Real &#187; Time for a rebranding?</title>
		<link>http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>The Funeral of the Real &#187; Time for a rebranding?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineclarity.co.uk/answers/2006/02/17/what-is-the-i-ching/#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>[...] These days &#8220;Gnostic&#8221; as a label feels like an ill-fitting suit. Ill-fitting suits are always bad, by definition. Better options include: a well-tailored suit, or casual but stylish. Given my personal dispositions, I&#8217;d have to go with casual but stylish. My blog has been getting a minor amount of attention outside of the Gnostocosm as well. I was flattered to find my first I Ching post referenced by Answers, an I Ching blog. Some of the things I talk about obviously have appeal beyond online Gnosticism. I think this blog can be Gnostic without being &#8220;a Gnostic blog.&#8221; And I can be Gnostic without being a Gnostic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These days &#8220;Gnostic&#8221; as a label feels like an ill-fitting suit. Ill-fitting suits are always bad, by definition. Better options include: a well-tailored suit, or casual but stylish. Given my personal dispositions, I&#8217;d have to go with casual but stylish. My blog has been getting a minor amount of attention outside of the Gnostocosm as well. I was flattered to find my first I Ching post referenced by Answers, an I Ching blog. Some of the things I talk about obviously have appeal beyond online Gnosticism. I think this blog can be Gnostic without being &#8220;a Gnostic blog.&#8221; And I can be Gnostic without being a Gnostic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
